Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Aronov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

David Aronov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

David Aronov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Political candidate for city council, does not have SIGCOV. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

• delete fails WP:NPOL. Non-notable candidate. Praxidicae (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Subject fails both WP:BASIC and WP:POLITICIAN. There is negligible coverage of the subject in news sources with only 2 article I could find that too very localised.--Deepak G Goswami (talk) 12:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete unelected candidates for city council are just plain not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:NPOL. Being a candidate for local office does not warrant notability. LefcentrerightDiscuss 21:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. People do not qualify for Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates for political offices they have not won, but this (a) makes no credible claim that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy, (b) makes no credible claim that his candidacy is markedly more special than everybody else's candidacies in any way that would pass the ten year test, and (c) is referenced entirely to primary sources and neighbourhood hyperlocals that don't clinch a WP:GNG pass. Even if he had a strong notability claim, it would still have to be referenced better than this. Obviously no prejudice against recreation if he actually wins, but nothing here already justifies an article today. Bearcat (talk) 11:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:09, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable politician. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 16:12, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
• Delete non notable --Devokewater @ 11:23, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.